Applied honours presentations evaluation
You must have JavaScript enabled to use this form.
Assessor and Speaker information
Assessor's name (you)
Assessor's e-mail
This e-mail address will be used to send a submission confirmation.
2024 T1 Speaker's name (student)
- None -
Jiarui (Rebecca ) Li
Minghao
Yu Cheng (Tony) Ye
Evaluation
Presentation
Marking Guide: - Add the mark for each criteria (out of 10). - or eyeball like previous years: Mainly unsatisfactory: < 33 // Mainly Satisfactory: ~33-41 // Mainly Excellent: ~41-47 // Mainly Outstanding: 48-50.
Engagement: Showing enthusiasm and being interactive.
Unsatisfactory (~0-5)
Satisfactory (~7)
Excellent (~9)
Outstanding (~10)
Visual Presentation: Clear slides (not crowded nor confused) with good use of figures or visual aids. No inconsistencies.
Unsatisfactory (~0-5)
Satisfactory (~7)
Excellent (~9)
Outstanding (~10)
Verbal Discussion: Explaining and expanding upon the slides clearly, with sufficient details.
Unsatisfactory (~0-5)
Satisfactory (~7)
Excellent (~9)
Outstanding (~10)
Timing (expected 15 +/-2 mins): Finishing on time (15 +/- 2minutes) with an appropriate depth of presentation.
Unsatisfactory (~0-5)
Satisfactory (~7)
Excellent (~9)
Outstanding (~10)
Questions: Answering questions confidently, referring to the presentation.
Unsatisfactory (~0-5)
Satisfactory (~7)
Excellent (~9)
Outstanding (~10)
Presentation mark (0-50)
Content
Marking Guide: - Add the mark for each criteria (out of 10). - or eyeball like previous years: Mainly unsatisfactory: < 33 // Mainly Satisfactory: ~33-41 // Mainly Excellent: ~41-47 // Mainly Outstanding: 48-50.
Level of presentation: Explaining and pitching the content well and at right technical level.
Unsatisfactory (~0-5)
Satisfactory (~7)
Excellent (~9)
Outstanding (~10)
Motivation for study: Clearly presenting a relevant motivation to the study.
Unsatisfactory (~0-5)
Satisfactory (~7)
Excellent (~9)
Outstanding (~10)
Description of method: Describing the methods in sufficient detail.
Unsatisfactory (~0-5)
Satisfactory (~7)
Excellent (~9)
Outstanding (~10)
Description of results: Clearly describing the results and their broader significance.
Unsatisfactory (~0-5)
Satisfactory (~7)
Excellent (~9)
Outstanding (~10)
Knowledge displayed: Displaying mastery of research topic and knowledge in the field.
Unsatisfactory (~0-5)
Satisfactory (~7)
Excellent (~9)
Outstanding (~10)
Content mark (0-50)
Comments (optional)
Leave this field blank